There is a movement afoot (of course in the basket of Liberalism called San Fransisco), to regulate fast food locations that sells toys in the meals (ala Happy Meals and McDonalds).
Here is a link to the article- http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/food/2010-08-13-kidsmeals13_ST_N.htm
I find it interesting that the study conclude the kids like the toys better than the food. Thus, the food and the establishment become the target?
Huh? Let’s force the fast food company to provide “better” nutritional value in the meals?
I’m just curious why it is the responsibility of the location, and NOT the parent? It’s not the kid who drives to Mcdonalds, orders a Happy Meal, and Pays for it. Is it?
No, it’s the Parents!
If the parents wanted something more nutritional, they would cook at home. Go to wholefoods. Order a salad.
No, the parents order for the kids because it’s “easy”.
It’s the same parent who has the “choice” to choose any of the food items on the menu.
Yes, let’s see…..”Umm…I’ll take the #1 Happy Meal with the bunless veggie burger and apple slices for my child, and can I have the um….#4 Double value big mac, make it super large, and what the heck throw in an apple pie so I won’t feel guilty forcing my kid to eat apple slices!”
Once again, it’s an attack and effort to “control” and regulate the problem, as opposed to realizing it’s the “source” (read Parents), who are the real problem.
Where is this world headed?
